The Paradox Of Community Essay -- essays research papers

The Paradox of Community sensation can see that insiders ar caught in the paradox of companionship The similar cultural vocabulary that undermines residential district is simultaneously thatcommunitys idiom of self-affirmation (Greenhouse, et al. 175). In honor andCommunity, David M. Engel explores how ordinary people in a small, rural,Illinois town perceive the law, courts, litigants, and community. By analyzingthe juristic practices and relations in drum sander County, it is evident that law andthe courts tactical manoeuvre a central role in the processes of making and unmakingcommunities. Furthermore, this study illustrates how such manifestations,reflections of the insiders ideology, fail to live up to the promises for law in our society.In the 1970s, electric sander County was undergoing great social and economicchanges. Agriculture, a central part of brio for most residents, became moremechanized and a few large manufacturing plants opened, livery in quite anumber of a certain cistron sander County had never had before (29). Long-time residents, worried about change, articulate what they believe to be the newrole of laws and the courts in the local and guinea pig society (1).Though personal injury judicial proceeding rates are lower in Sander County thanother major types of litigation, a average of aversion towards this legal discourseis evident throughout the majority of the community. Those who apply personalinjury claims are viewed by fellow residents as greedy, selfish, and quickly tosue. Litigation is portrayed as weakening the collective values personified inthe law as a means of turning the law against the community to make an easybuck (144). Even highly respected members of the community are criticized formaking personal injury claims. For example, a minister filed a suit afterslipping and falling at a school. A local observer commented by saying thereare a lot of people who are resentful for it, because...he chose to sue (28).The long-time residents of Sander County were experiencing a prevalent sense ofa collapse in the conventional dependencies and exchanges that had typified alivenessin Sander County. Understandings of personal injury claims are largely makeby these societal transformations as the local populace encounters them and alsoby the notion that traditional relati... ...ty (Carter 11).The irony lies in the fact that the power of the insiders as a whole disempowersthe individual, whether the individual is an insider or an outsider. Everymember of Sander County is rather powerless before the law the efforts to keepthe town respectable from change paradoxically caused a lack of trust in the legalprocess. This lack of trust contributes to the chaos of community that alreadyexisted in Sander County.Law is a language by which we constantly reconstruct our communities(Carter viii). quite of constructing community through just legal discourse,Sander County destructed what it had left of a community in a desperate act ofwarding of that which it did not insure (or did not want to understand).Law in practice, in Sander County, does not produce justice it producesinequality. This prevalent inequality, or difference, is a justification oflitigation by insiders in defense of their community (Greenhouse, et al. 175).They fail to see that their allegory of community is challenging community.Disempowerment and inequality will not generate trust. Furthermore, of what use,or longevity, is a community without trust?