Internal Revenue Service Essay Example for Free

Internal gross Service EssayAccording to the Internal Revenue Service, a valuepayer has the preference between five different file statues. The five military positiones ar, Single, Married Filing Separately, Married Filing Jointly, moderate of Household, and Qualifying Widow(er) with dependent child. For the mate in question, the recommendation I am making is that they use the file status of unify filing jointly. Since the straddle has three children they provide qualify for three dependency exemptions as well as two exemptions for themselves. Since all told(prenominal) three of the children still live in the household and all of the children are under the age of nineteen the couple is allowed to claim them as dependents. On the another(prenominal) hand, the couple cannot claim mate Bs mother since they did not supply over fifty portion of the support for her for the year they are filing. The substance get a commodious of the mothers living expense, including the cost of rent, food, and other expenses brings the follow support to seven thousand dollars and the mother supplies the couple with $7920 a year. The money that she supplies is what she receives from her Social credentials benefits.The reason that the couple should not file under the status married filing separately is because the tax rates are higher than the tax rates for those filing under the status married filing jointly. Also, there several deductions, credits, and exclusions that are allowed for the status married filing jointly that are not allowed for those that are choosing to file separately. One example, is that the couple would only be able to deduct $250,000 of the income from the sale of the someoneal planetary house if they had filed separately, where if they choose to file jointly they will be allowed to excluded the entire add together of income from the sale.The definition of income, as give tongue to by the Internal Revenue Service, is all income of the tax payer whether it is taxable or non-taxable. The couple has several items that are considered as taxable income. Those items included, cooperator As income from the discovernership in Fan Company A of $142,000, the $2000 of income from the city Park referee job, the dividends for 2011 that spouse A received from Company E, the income that souse B received straining the Controller job of $88,000, and the $5000 passing play that spouse B incurred while they were unemployed. The couple also have items that sink under being considered as non-taxable income.Those items are, the child support that spouse B receives in the amount of $2400 for treat of the child, the tax exempt interest payments received from Municipal Bonds in the amount of$900, and the $296,000 of income from the sale of the couples personal residence. There is an allowance to taxpayers of $250,000 exclusion on the sale of the taxpayers principal residence, and for couples that file under the status married filing j ointly, the amount of the exclusion rises to $500,000. A profit on the sale of a not bad(p) addition is a chief city shed light on, and a loss on the sale of a capital asset is a capital loss. There are short-term capital gains and losses and there are semipermanent capital gains and losses. A short-term asset is an asset that has been in the taxpayers possession for less than a year, and a long-term asset is an asset that the taxpayer has held for more than a year. Initially it seems that the couple has a long-term capital gain in the amount of $44,000 for the year since they sold a rental berth that the couple has held for foursome years that was purchased for $90,000 and they sold it for $134,000.The gain would be then added to the couples total income for the year. The couple had a short-term capital loss in the amount of $5,000 from the day trading that spouse B was composite while unemployed. The Internal Revenue Service only allows for a $3,000 capital loss per filing y ear, so the remaining $2,000 will need to be carried forward to the next filing year. The loss would be subtracted from the couples total income for the year. If the couple have a gain for one item and a loss for another item, the amounts will offset each other. For example, if the couple has a total of $10,000 in capital gain and a capital loss of $5,000 ($10,000 $5,000 = $5,000), their income would increase by $5,000. Any of the proceeds that come from the sale of a personal residence will be subject to taxes.Since there is a rule for a married filing jointly couple, the couple will be able to exclude the entire $296,000 from income. The rule states that a married filing jointly couple are allowed an exclusion up to $500,000 as long as the taxpayer owns the property and has been residing in the residence for a minimum of two of the previous five years foregoing to selling the residence. Also the exclusion would not be allowed if the couple had sold a residence and utilize the e xclusion in the last two years. On the other hand, when the couple sold the rental property, all of the proceeds from that sale are taxable. If the couple realized a profit from the sale it would be a capital gain and would be added to total income for the year, and the event that they realized a loss it would be deducted from total income for the year.Since spouse A was in apartnership, a K-1 was issued to the spouse stating that $142,000 was the spouses share of the income from the partnership. This amount would be added to the couples total income for the year. Spouse A did withdraw an amount totaling $83,500 over the line of reasoning of the year. The withdraw amount would not be subject to tax since it did not exceed the foundation garment that spouse A had in the partnership. Passive activities are defined as income producing ventures that the owner does not actively get in in. Owning rental properties are also considered a passive activity. The couple did have some items that would be considered to be passive activities.The couple had two rental properties that they owned which brought in total of $23,000 in rents and had a total of $29,200 in associated expenses and depreciation. The couple would recognize a passive loss for this income of $6,200, ($23,000 $29,200 = -$6,200). The couple also had a passive gain of $44,000 when they sold a third rental property. The impact these items have on the couples income would be a total of $37,800 in passive gain. The $44,000 gain from the sale of the third rental property minus the loss of $6,200 on the other two rental properties, ($44,000 $6,200).A $44,000 passive gain on the sale of a rental property, which could be offset when the adjusted cost basis is figured for the property. This basis will take into account purchase costs, selling costs, improvements, rent received in this period, and accumulated depreciation. The adjustments to income that I would include on the couples return would be the alimon y that was paid to spouse As ex-wife, the contributions that were do to the Keogh retirement plan, a portion of the self-employment tax, a possible deduction for paid health insurance, and possible deduction for their dependent in college. The alimony qualifies as an adjustment because a deduction is allowed for the person paying the alimony. The contributions made to the Keogh retirement plan also meet the rules set by the Internal Revenue Service for deductibility.The amount contributed falls under the maximum allowed and therefore are deductible. The tax code allows for a partner to deduct a portion of the self-employment tax, such tax would have been paid on spouse As income from the partnership and the couple would be allowed a deduction. The health insurance that spouse A has through the partnership may qualify for a self-employed health insurance deduction. Thecost of discipline and fees that the couple paid on behalf of their dependent that is attending college might be d eductible if the couples AGI falls under the maximum allowed income of $160,000. My recommendation is for the couple to take the standard deduction, opposed to itemizing. The standard deductions will offer more than itemizing. Itemizing would require the couple to have expenses that exceed 7.5% of their adjusted gross income, and with the items that would be allowed for deductions, that amount would not be reached.The couple would receive a larger tax break by fetching the standard deductions. The deductions that the couple would not be able to claim are the mileage that spouse B incurred commuting to and from work or the amount spent on business suits because the mileage was not part of actually performing work tasks and the suits would be able to deemed as normal wear and could be indistinct for activities other than work. The deductions that the couple could claim if they itemized are any medical expenses that exceed 7.5% of the couples AGI and the kindly contributions that th e couple made during the year that totaled $6,000.The credits that the couple would be able to claim would be the Child Tax credit, the American luck Tax Credit, and the Savers Credit. The Child Tax Credit is a credit of $1,000 for each qualifying child, which would give the couple a total of $2,000 as long as the couples AGI is not above $110,000, if their AGI is above that amount the credit is reduced. The American Opportunity Tax Credit allows a credit of up to $2,500 for qualifying expenses of a college student, which is applied to couples that have an AGI up to $160,000. The Savers Credit allows for a credit up to $2,000 for jointly filing taxpayers that have made contributions to a qualifying retirement plan.